Re: push parser

[Bob Rossi]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:55:08PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bob Rossi <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > If we force the user to define that function, it add's an unnecessary 
> > complication to the push parser. That is, the user is mostly likely 
> > going to call yypushparse, and not care about yyparse at all. However,
> > yyparse is the function causing the user to define the yypushlex
> > function. What do you think I should do to resolve this?
> 
> Ah, sorry, I didn't understand this issue at all.
> 
> It sounds to me like the push parser shouldn't define yyparse.  That
> way, the user shouldn't have to care about any lexer function.

I agree. Akim, you were the main advocate for adding this functionality. Can
you see any other solution to the problem besides remove yyparse from
the generated output?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi