Re: push parser

[Paul Eggert]

Bob Rossi <address@hidden> writes:

> If we force the user to define that function, it add's an unnecessary 
> complication to the push parser. That is, the user is mostly likely 
> going to call yypushparse, and not care about yyparse at all. However,
> yyparse is the function causing the user to define the yypushlex
> function. What do you think I should do to resolve this?

Ah, sorry, I didn't understand this issue at all.

It sounds to me like the push parser shouldn't define yyparse.  That
way, the user shouldn't have to care about any lexer function.