Re: push parser implemenation

[Paul Eggert]

Bob Rossi <address@hidden> writes:

> OK, I see. So, currently, when you choose push-parser, I have the
> skeleton generate a function prototype:
>   void yyparse (void *PVVOID);
>
> Do you suggest I keep this functionality, and allow the user to use
> the %parse-param option on top of that? or do you suggest I should 
> not automatically generate the "void *PVVOID" parameter, and force the
> user to use %pase-param along with %push-parser?

I was thinking the latter.  It's more type-safe.  And it's simpler
not to give the user an option they don't really need.