Re: FYI: fix %start after first rule

[Joel E. Denny]

On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:

> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I've just noticed that I'm not being so consistent with how I choose where 
> > to add test cases.  Should all bugs be demonstrated in regression.at?  Or 
> > is it better to be more specific when another set, like input.at, makes 
> > sense?
> 
> I prefer the latter, as it has better long-term implications, but it's
> not a huge deal either way.

That's my thinking as well... when I can remember.

Thanks.

Joel