Re: FYI: fix %start after first rule

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> I've just noticed that I'm not being so consistent with how I choose where 
> to add test cases.  Should all bugs be demonstrated in regression.at?  Or 
> is it better to be more specific when another set, like input.at, makes 
> sense?

I prefer the latter, as it has better long-term implications, but it's
not a huge deal either way.