Re: failure to call copy_character

[Florian Krohm]

> |
> |           case '{':
> | -           obstack_1grow (&action_obstack, c);
> | +           copy_character (&action_obstack, c);
> |             ++count;
> |             break;
>
> These two are quite useless, but it is safer, so do as you want wrt
> this one.
>

Yes, I know. I did it because I thought that copy_character should be
the only function that knows which characters need special treatment.
If we decide to follow this rule, then there are some more occurences
of obstack_1grow that should be changed. It would be more consistent
IMHO.

>
> Please, install.

Done.

Florian