[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:48:56 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 12:06 PM
> To: Joerg Wunsch
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
>
>
> Ok, thanks for the feedback. Eric says the same. Conclusion:
>
> No matter how had it is needed to compile code for XYZ.
> No matter how well it is explained and documented.
> No matter how small the delta to -mmcu=xyz is
>
> People won't use it.
Just so you know, I'm deeply sympathetic towards your viewpoint. I really wish
it were different. It's only been my experience of doing this for a long period
of time (and Joerg, even longer than I) that has taught me otherwise.
Eric
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/12/01
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/12/02
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/12/02
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/12/02
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/12/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/12/04