[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] Re: [patch #6951] Time posix patch.
From: |
Daniele Basile |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] Re: [patch #6951] Time posix patch. |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:13:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On 21-12-2010 12:11, Frank Ennert wrote:
>
> Follow-up Comment #9, patch #6951 (project avr-libc):
>
> As someone interested in using the patch in a project I took it upon me to
> check the copyright of the NEWLIB files.
>
> Unfortunately the situation isn't clear. The time files I checked in NEWLIB
> all had a simple statement like
>
> "Original Author: G. Haley"
>
> in the code. E.g.
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/newlib/libc/time/gmtime.c?annotate=1.4&cvsroot=src
> I didn't check all libc/time files.
>
> NEWLIB itself points to http://sourceware.org/newlib/COPYING.NEWLIB for
> license details. But that file doesn't contain any reference to a "G. Haley".
>
> Googleing produces a document about NEWLIB http://www.gnuarm.com/pdf/libc.pdf
> where a certain Graham Haley is mentioned:
>
> "'libc' includes software developed by Martin Jackson, Graham Haley and Steve
> Chamberlain of Tadpole Technology and released to Cygnus."
>
> But COPYING.NEWLIB doesn't mention Tadpole or Cygnus. I have no idea what
> "released to" means. For me that code is to hot to touch. I guess I have to
> write my own time functions.
>
Thanks for reply,
I understand the your point, and I agree with you. If you don't have
hurry, I can rewrite the patch to round on the licence troubles.
I saw the code and isn't so much complicate to rewrite it.
Let me know what do to you think.
--
| [D]-o Ing. Daniele Basile - address@hidden
| ||}-o Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
| [B]-o http://www.develer.com/ - http://www.bertos.org/