|Subject:||Re: [avr-libc-dev] Change EEPROM SFR definition.|
|Date:||Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:13:36 +0200|
|User-agent:||Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)|
E. Weddington wrote:
Björn Haase wrote:Another alternative is to provide smarter macros or inline functions for eeprom support that contain inline assembly for calling different versions of the eeprom routines.That's a reasonable idea. Would anyone have any objection to having the EEPROM routines be inline assembly macros instead of library calls?I'm even willing to write up such a module, though it would have to be after my vacation (which starts in an hour ;-)).Eric
Will this increase program size, for instance if a program writes the EEPROM in ten different places? If so one can make a function that calls the macro once but again documentation should be very clear about such a change.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|