Re: [avr-libc-dev] Change EEPROM SFR definition.

[E. Weddington]

Björn Haase wrote:

> Another alternative is to provide smarter macros or inline functions for 
> eeprom support that contain inline assembly for calling different versions of 
> the eeprom routines.

That's a reasonable idea. Would anyone have any objection to having the 
EEPROM routines be inline assembly macros instead of library calls?

I'm even willing to write up such a module, though it would have to be 
after my vacation (which starts in an hour ;-)).

Eric