|Subject:||Re: [avr-libc-dev] Change EEPROM SFR definition.|
|Date:||Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:50:33 -0600|
|User-agent:||Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)|
Björn Haase wrote:
Another alternative is to provide smarter macros or inline functions for eeprom support that contain inline assembly for calling different versions of the eeprom routines.
That's a reasonable idea. Would anyone have any objection to having the EEPROM routines be inline assembly macros instead of library calls?
I'm even willing to write up such a module, though it would have to be after my vacation (which starts in an hour ;-)).
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|