[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency

From: E. Weddington
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:48:30 -0700

On 25 Feb 2004 at 22:36, Theodore A. Roth wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Artur Lipowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is (iom162_h_p1.patch) my proposal to make m162 USART signal names 
> > consistent with rest of the world.
> > 
> > The second patch (iom162_h_p1.patch) prohibits compilation of code with 
> > old signal names.
> I don't think these will go in.
> I had tried to do this a while back and met some resistance so I dropped it:
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2002-12/msg00074.html

However, from that thread, there is *strong* support for creating a "generic" 
uart layer over 
this, that way users could create uart code that is compatible across many AVR 
devices. IIRC, 
we all have agreed that that is a Desirable Thing, but noboby has implemented 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]