Re: [avr-libc-dev] atof routine

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Colin O'Flynn wrote:

> >#define atof(s) strtod(s, (char **)0)
> 
> Hmm THAT is certainly easier,

I thought so. :-)

Maybe we should even include that #define.

> Or move the routine up with the rest of the strtoX
> routines, as I looked there, then looked down at the
> bottem with the unimplemented routines.

Hmm, i'll have a look there.  Why didn't you browse the docs?  I
thought it is documented...

> I noticed the routine says: implemented, but not yet
> tested. I could do a bit of quick testing (writing
> values and reading them out basically).

This comment might be out of date, but please do.  If we get
positive feedback from you, we'll delete that remark.

-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/