RE: [Avr-libc-corelib] Folder structure

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> gnu.org] On Behalf Of Dave N6NZ
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:44 AM
> To: Frédéric Nadeau
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Avr-libc-corelib] Folder structure
> 
> 
> > 
> > BTW, I still did not receive any comments on the CAN api.
> 
> Well, I started reading it, but after a while decided that 
> comments ought to come from someone who has actually used the 
> CAN functionality of the AVR CAN peripheral,

This is why I mentioned that we should start out with the SPI. It is one of the 
most simplest peripherals and everyone is more likely to agree on that first. 
It is important to have early successes to keep everyone excited and moving 
forward. If you lead with complex peripherals (like the CAN), and complex 
peripherals that have potential controversy (such as a UART, because there are 
a lot of ways to implement it), then it will kill the goodwill of volunteers 
and this will likely go nowhere fast. Just my 2 cents.

Eric