Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated

[Russell Shaw]

On 11/4/21 8:36 am, Trampas Stern wrote:
> Actually C++ is not slower or more bloat than C, depending on the features used.
>
> For example I do not use RTTI or exceptions, so that makes it about the same as 
> C for size. Yes you have to turn these features off in your compiler (-fno-rtti, 
> -fno-exceptions).  Sure you have trampolines or jump tables for function 
> overloading but you have to do the same in C. If you do not use inheritance or 
> function overloading you do not have the penalty.

Function overloading is a compile-time concept, but the result after name scope 
flattening are simple function names that are called without any extra pointer 
indirections (ie, no different than C).

C++ is as efficient as C only if what is written translates to the equivalent 
form. This is easy to do, but only after a large hurdle of understanding how C++ 
compilers work.

The biggest shortcoming in the C++ "industry" is that there is no literature i 
have seen that explains in a compact way how you can look at a piece of C++ code 
and see how it would translate to the equivalent assembly, which is the main 
advantage of C.