Re: [avr-gcc-list] fdevopen() uses calloc?

[Rod Moffitt]

I entirely agree. It would be great if fdevopen could be stripped down (to
a malloc-less version) when libc is being built, akin to what is done
with printf with the floating point support.

- Rod

--
                         ___  ____  ___    _      ___
 Rod Moffitt            / _ \/ __ \/ _ \  (_)__  / _/__
 http://rod.info       / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \
 address@hidden /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/
 =======================================================
 ~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> "J.C. Wren" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > What about something like this?  Create fdevopens(), which is
> > basically identical to fdevopen(), except uses an internal static
> > __file instance.
> 
> I rather thought about the same kind of linker trickery as it is done
> for the decision between standard, full (floating-point), and minimal
> printf/scanf versions.  That way, the source code would always use
> fdevopen(), but the linker configuration decides which implementation
> of fdevopen() to use.
> 
> -- 
> J"org Wunsch                                         Unix support engineer
> address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>