[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-gcc-list] GDB and avrmon-stk200
From: |
Gopal Santhanam |
Subject: |
[avr-gcc-list] GDB and avrmon-stk200 |
Date: |
07 Jul 2002 10:44:50 -0700 |
Hi,
I have been trying to setup avrmon-stk200 with gcc & gdb. Here are some
of my experiences along with a few questions.
1) Are there any plans to migrate avrmon-stk200 over to the gdb 5.2
infrastructure? I understand there needs to be some significant changes
to make this happen. I also see there is a push for development on the
AVaRICE alternative. However, since AVR JTAG is only available on a few
AVR parts, it would still be very nice to have this low-cost,
quick-and-dirty SPI dongle debugging solution.
2) I am having some slight problems with the parallel port access. If I
use uisp, I must rmmod parport_pc and reinstall it before I can use the
host's "mon" program. Has anyone seen this before? How is it possible
to reset the parallel port within the mon program? Also, is there any
way I can easily use "mon" in user mode? (I presume the only way is
setuid since the program uses the privileged function 'ioperm'.)
3) I tried using the RPM distribution of avr-gcc-3.0.4,
avr-binutils-2.11.2-2, and avr-libc-20020203-4 from the Simulavr
homepage. Using these tools to cross-compile the AVR code seems to
break the target monitor . The stepping functionality was totally
hosed. On the other hand, everything is okay when using gcc-3.0.2,
binutils-2.11.2, and avr-libc-20010821. Some more investigation
suggests that this is an issue with the libc version! I find that the
last libc revision that works is avr-libc-20011029
4) When compiling gdb-4.18 with the avr patch, I only linked the opcodes
and bfd directories from the binutils source tree to the gdb source
tree. I was unable to compile if I linked the include directory as is
stated in http://home.overta.ru/users/denisc/gdb/BUILD.avr-gdb. As it
stands I see the same backtrace problem as quoted in
http://avr.jpk.co.nz/pipermail/avr-gcc-list/2001-October/000859.html
and I am unable to disassemble the program through gdb. Both backtrace
and diassembly work in gdb 5.0 but there are other problems (see next
item).
5) I figured out part of the register problems with gdb 5.0. This was
first noted in the following post:
http://avr.jpk.co.nz/pipermail/avr-gcc-list/2001-October/000860.html
I see that the function monitor_supply_register is pickier in gdb 5.0
than in gdb 4.18. It wants an '\n' or '\r' after each register in the
register dump. I made a small fix in avrmon-stk200/host/mon.c to
reflect this. However, things still aren't totally fixed. When using
"info registers" in gdb, only a few of the registers are displayed. GDB
prints the message "*value not available*" for most of the registers.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Gopal
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- [avr-gcc-list] GDB and avrmon-stk200,
Gopal Santhanam <=