Re: [avr-gcc-list] atmega128

[Scott Finneran]

Eivind,

I don't understand what you mean by "heavy patching". The process is well
documented and from memory, consists of about 6 commands (2 patch, 2 configure,
2 make). 

Unfortunately, if you don't want to patch and you can't wait for official
releases, then I don't know what to suggest.

Good Luck,

Scott

Quoting webmaster <address@hidden>:

> Well, we have to realize that this kind of heavy patching work may not
> be
> for everybody.
> I cant wait until a new release of gcc is due; so we perhaps get these
> upgrades compiled into avrgcc and the binutils.
> 
>     Eivind
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Finneran" <address@hidden>
> To: "avr-gcc-list" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] atmega128
> 
> 
> >
> > No, we have a project with >10000 NCSL (Non-commentary Source Lines)
> of
> > asm/c/c++ running just fine on the ATMega128. Peter Jansen posted a
> > number of patches to binutils & gcc to this list (some of which are
> in
> > the latest releases of these packages).
> >
> > I assume that you have already searched throught the list archive?
> 
> 
> avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
> 
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org