[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: call for help/crazy idea: nmake support
From: |
'Ralf Wildenhues' |
Subject: |
Re: call for help/crazy idea: nmake support |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:28:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
* David Byron wrote on Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 07:25:16PM CEST:
> On Saturday, July 31, 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > OK, so what if they are not actually running configure (or
> > would not actually need to)? Presumably automake could
> > produce a ready nmake file (or forbid, a vcproj) in at
> > least simple cases?
>
> I could use some more info on how this would work in practice. Does this
> mean that tarballs of packaged source contain an nmake file in addition to
> configure and Makefile.in? I don't think it's safe to assume that one nmake
> file is sufficient for all MSVC tool + Platform SDK versions.
>
> Plus also, if end users don't run configure they lose the ability to pass
> args to configure (either --with-* or environment variable definitions).
Sure. I have no idea yet how exactly this could work in practice.
I don't know these tools yet. I'm just throwing out these ideas to
see if somebody has good input.
In such a project, is there any scripting besides CMD that one could
rely on?
Thanks!
Ralf