[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: call for help/crazy idea: nmake support
From: |
David Byron |
Subject: |
RE: call for help/crazy idea: nmake support |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:25:16 -0700 |
On Saturday, July 31, 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * David Byron wrote on Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:41:29PM CEST:
>
> > If someone is running autotools (or even a generated
> > configure script) on windows, I think we can assume
> > they've either got cygwin or msys which implies access
> > to make.
>
> OK, so what if they are not actually running configure (or
> would not actually need to)? Presumably automake could
> produce a ready nmake file (or forbid, a vcproj) in at
> least simple cases?
I could use some more info on how this would work in practice. Does this
mean that tarballs of packaged source contain an nmake file in addition to
configure and Makefile.in? I don't think it's safe to assume that one nmake
file is sufficient for all MSVC tool + Platform SDK versions.
Plus also, if end users don't run configure they lose the ability to pass
args to configure (either --with-* or environment variable definitions).
-DB