[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:56:39 -0500 (CDT) |
It seems that some folks on this list just can't help but retain all
previous content from the discussion thread and put their few lines at
the bottom of the new email. This requires paging down five or six
screens of text just to find the tiny tidbit which was added.
There is only so much time in the day and these sort of emails are an
offense to the continued development of free software. Henceforth I
will simply delete such obscenely-quoted emails without reading them.
I suggest that others do the same.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/10/07
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Peter Johansson, 2008/10/07
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/10/08
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Peter Johansson, 2008/10/08
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/10/08
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Peter Johansson, 2008/10/08
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/10/08
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Peter Johansson, 2008/10/08
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD, Michel Briand, 2008/10/09
- mailing list netiquette (was: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/09