[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Conditional Library Compilation
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
RE: Conditional Library Compilation |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:58:02 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Drummonds, Scott B wrote:
> From: Frederik Fouvry [mailto:address@hidden
> > You can install it on other places than /usr/share or /usr/local
> > (forgot which one is the default) with
>
> But I don't own the large software project that I'm trying to modify.
> If I upgrade the version of Automake to provide a feature I need in the
> build environment, it will be my responsibility to validate the existing
> multi-million line project against the new version. If you're telling
> me that Automake is 100% forward compatible--that I can upgrade from 1.4
> to the newest version and there will be no errors in Automake
> execution--then I'm on it! But my experience leads me to believe that
> this is not the case.
Automake is very good at telling you about incompatibilities while
upgrading. I don't recall Automake misbehaving at run-time due to an
incompatibility, but it is possible that it may have happened before
and I just don't remember.
Upgrading Autoconf is much more of a concern than upgrading Automake.
Unfortunately, newer Automake's require newer Autoconfs.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, (continued)
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/03
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/03
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/04
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/05
- Re: Conditional Library Compilation, Frederik Fouvry, 2004/02/05
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/05
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation,
Bob Friesenhahn <=