[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Conditional Library Compilation
From: |
Drummonds, Scott B |
Subject: |
RE: Conditional Library Compilation |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:35:42 -0800 |
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:address@hidden
> What are the symptoms? (i.e., what "doesn't work" means?)
To follow up with even more detail about this, Makefile.am looks like
this:
<quote>
noinst_LIBRARIES = libNormal.a
if FEATURE
noinst_LIBRARIES += libNormalFeature.a
endif
libNormal_a_SOURCES = source.cpp
if FEATURE
libNormalFeature_a_SOURCES = $(libNormal_a_SOURCES)
libNormalFeature_a_CXXFLAGS = -DFEATURE
endif
</quote>
But, the Makefile that is generated from that Makefile.am has the above
statements in the following order:
<quote>
noinst_LIBRARIES = libNormal.a
...
libNormal_a_SOURCES = source.cpp
...
LIBRARIES = $(noinst_LIBRARIES)
...
noinst_LIBRARIES += libNormalFeature.a
libNormalFeature_a_SOURCES = $(libNormal_a_SOURCES)
libNormalFeature_a_CXXFLAGS = -DFEATURE
</quote>
Since LIBRARIES gets set with the value of noinst_LIBRARIES before it is
augmented to include my special library, doesn't that mean that the
special library won't ever get built? Why is the 'noinst_LIBRARIES +='
code in the conditional statement being inserted so late in the file
even though it is specified right after the original 'noinst_LIBRARIES =
' statement?
Scott
- Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/03
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/03
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/03
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation,
Drummonds, Scott B <=
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/05
- Re: Conditional Library Compilation, Frederik Fouvry, 2004/02/05
- RE: Conditional Library Compilation, Drummonds, Scott B, 2004/02/05