[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:46:51 +0100 |
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 17:49, Tom Tromey wrote:
> The problem is, automake generates an explicit rule for each
> compilation. Our resulting Makefile.in is nearly 9 megabytes. This
> is really much too large -- compare to 200K with automake 1.4.
For subdir-compilation/non-recursive Makefiles automake generates *2*
explicit rules (cygwin and n/cygwin) for each compilation. Folding these
two rules into one, alone would reduce the size of Makefiles using many
files by almost factor 2.
Ralf
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, (continued)
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/30
- mailing list archives (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30
- Re: mailing list archives (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects), Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/30
- Re: mailing list archives, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/27
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/30
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30
Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Ralf Corsepius <=