[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:40:25 +0100 |
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 16:01, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > What about an automake option then to generate Makefiles for GNU make?
>
> How about a new binary 'automake' program that doesn't require an
> external 'make' program at all? It would read the Makefile.am files
> directly ...
How many times did you resort to using "plain make"-rule in Makefile.ams?
So, IMO, for being useful, you'd either have to extend make to accept
the *.am-syntax or to reimplement make.
Ralf
- automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Lars Hecking, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Norman Gray, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/12/18
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Paul D. Smith, 2003/12/19
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16