Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Jun 30 2001 23:59:29 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• June 30, 2001
  • EXTRA_DIST = config.h.in, Bruce Korb, 23:59
  • if (! defined $configure_vars{'YACC'}), Bruce Korb, 21:48
• June 29, 2001
  • dependency tracking history, Tom Tromey, 20:11
  • automake usage, Tom Tromey, 14:09
• June 28, 2001
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Tom Tromey, 14:57
  • Re: Supporting include in Makefiles, Raja R Harinath, 14:12
  • Re: Supporting include in Makefiles, Akim Demaille, 12:38
  • Re: Supporting include in Makefiles, Akim Demaille, 12:29
• June 27, 2001
  • Supporting include in Makefiles, Dean Povey, 17:38
  • Re: automake-cvs, Ralf Corsepius, 11:48
  • Re: automake-cvs, Tim Van Holder, 11:22
  • automake-cvs, Ralf Corsepius, 10:27
• June 26, 2001
  • WHY NOT TRY IT?, , 18:38
  • Re: automake 1.4 : --copy problem?, Gary V . Vaughan, 13:50
  • Re: automake 1.4 : --copy problem?, David Lee, 05:34
• June 25, 2001
  • Re: automake 1.4 : --copy problem?, Gary V . Vaughan, 15:30
  • automake 1.4 : --copy problem?, David Lee, 13:07
  • Re: override default CXXFLAGS, Tilo Riemer, 11:11
• June 24, 2001
  • Earn Up to $10 for each animal placed in a loving home, pets1111us, 12:07
• June 23, 2001
  • Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Clark Rawlins, 22:06
  • Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Gary V . Vaughan, 08:48
• June 22, 2001
  • Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Clark Rawlins, 19:38
  • Re: override default CXXFLAGS, Gary V . Vaughan, 13:43
  • Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Gary V . Vaughan, 13:39
  • Re: override default CXXFLAGS, Rusty Ballinger, 06:48
  • Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Clark Rawlins, 06:41
  • override default CXXFLAGS, Tilo Riemer, 06:19
• June 21, 2001
  • Re: What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Tom Tromey, 20:30
  • What version of autoconf is required for automake-1.4f?, Clark Rawlins, 18:49
  • Re: automatic dependency tracking, Tom Tromey, 10:58
  • RE: automatic dependency tracking, Kremp, Johannes (Extern), 05:28
  • RE: unterminated conditionals, Kremp, Johannes (Extern), 05:22
  • Re: install-strip and bin_SCRIPTS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:05
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Alexandre Oliva, 00:01
• June 20, 2001
  • Re: Feature suggestion, Alexandre Oliva, 23:57
  • Re: Patches in Gnats?, Alexandre Oliva, 23:56
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Tom Tromey, 20:20
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Tom Tromey, 20:17
  • Feature suggestion, Tom Tromey, 20:05
  • Re: install-strip and bin_SCRIPTS, Emil Ong, 13:22
  • Re: unterminated conditionals, Tom Tromey, 12:52
  • Re: automatic dependency tracking, Tom Tromey, 12:51
  • Re: install-strip and bin_SCRIPTS, Tom Tromey, 12:48
  • Re: install-strip and bin_SCRIPTS, Emil Ong, 11:57
  • automatic dependency tracking, Kremp, Johannes (Extern), 09:29
  • unterminated conditionals, Kremp, Johannes (Extern), 07:14
  • Re: Regarding automake and autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:52
  • Re: random automake questions, David Petrou, 01:19
• June 19, 2001
  • Re: Patches in Gnats?, Tom Tromey, 20:35
  • Re: Has automake been adapted to autoconf 2.50?, Tom Tromey, 20:34
  • Re: install-strip and bin_SCRIPTS, Tom Tromey, 20:31
  • Re: random automake questions, Tom Tromey, 19:19
  • Re: Regarding automake and autoconf, Tom Tromey, 18:59
  • Re: install script needs other permissions, Tom Tromey, 18:58
  • random automake questions, David Petrou, 18:30
  • Regarding automake and autoconf, Sreedharan, Sreekant, 18:08
  • Re: install script needs other permissions, Peter Eisentraut, 13:35
  • install script needs other permissions, Achim Gaedke, 11:28
  • install-strip and bin_SCRIPTS, Emil Ong, 10:07
• June 18, 2001
  • Re: depcomp problem [Fwd: Trying to compile latest CVS on old SCO unixware 2], Derek R. Price, 15:04
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Ralf Corsepius, 07:43
  • Has automake been adapted to autoconf 2.50?, Paolo Bonzini, 06:22
• June 17, 2001
  • Re: missing does not support configure.ac in CVS or in 1.4-p4, Alexandre Oliva, 21:55
  • Re: missing does not support configure.ac in CVS or in 1.4-p4, Martin Dickopp, 20:21
  • Re: Patches in Gnats?, Alexandre Oliva, 16:28
  • Re: AM_CFLAGS and sub/foo.c, Alexandre Oliva, 16:22
  • Re: missing does not support configure.ac in CVS or in 1.4-p4, Alexandre Oliva, 16:03
• June 15, 2001
  • Re: depcomp problem [Fwd: Trying to compile latest CVS on old SCO unixware 2], Tom Tromey, 13:37
  • Re: libtool is not removed in 1.4f, but is removed in 1.4-p4, Tom Tromey, 13:32
  • Re: depcomp problem [Fwd: Trying to compile latest CVS on old SCO unixware 2], Stephen Cameron, 09:48
  • Re: problems with mdate-sh and version.texi without AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR in 1.4f, Kevin Dalley, 08:02
  • AN INCREDIBLE EXPERIENCE !, BESTMEGAWEB, 07:36
  • Re: libtool is not removed in 1.4f, but is removed in 1.4-p4, Kevin Dalley, 07:10
  • Re: aclocal -I, Lars J. Aas, 07:05
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Richard Boulton, 06:16
  • Re: aclocal -I, Bob Proulx, 01:42
  • Re: AM_CFLAGS and sub/foo.c, Steve M. Robbins, 00:43
• June 14, 2001
  • Re: libtool is not removed in 1.4f, but is removed in 1.4-p4, Tom Tromey, 22:13
  • Re: depcomp problem [Fwd: Trying to compile latest CVS on old SCO unixware 2], Tom Tromey, 21:49
  • Re: aclocal -I, Tom Tromey, 21:39
  • Re: AM_CFLAGS and sub/foo.c, Tom Tromey, 21:24
  • Re: config.sub/config.guess license exception, but not for 'missing', Nathan Neulinger, 21:05
  • Patches in Gnats?, Tom Tromey, 21:00
  • Re: config.sub/config.guess license exception, but not for 'missing', Tom Tromey, 20:59
  • Re: problems with mdate-sh and version.texi without AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR in 1.4f, Tom Tromey, 20:55
  • Re: interpolating automake variables?, Tom Tromey, 20:49
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Tom Tromey, 20:45
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Pavel Roskin, 20:40
  • libtool is not removed in 1.4f, but is removed in 1.4-p4, Kevin Dalley, 20:35
  • Re: AM_CFLAGS and sub/foo.c, Tom Tromey, 20:35
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Raja R Harinath, 18:49
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Richard Boulton, 17:55
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Raja R Harinath, 16:17
  • KEEP 100% OF THE REVENUE YOU GENERATE!, mailer332, 15:45
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@) [PATCH], Richard Boulton, 15:04
  • depcomp problem [Fwd: Trying to compile latest CVS on old SCO unixware 2], Derek R. Price, 11:44
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Akim Demaille, 11:27
  • aclocal -I, Lars J. Aas, 11:26
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Akim Demaille, 11:18
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Akim Demaille, 11:11
  • Re: Do not install a binary, László Kovács, 06:49
  • Re: Do not install a binary, Stephane Genaud, 06:44
  • Do not install a binary, Laszlo Kovacs, 06:28
• June 13, 2001
  • AM_CFLAGS and sub/foo.c, Steve M. Robbins, 19:17
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Ralf Corsepius, 07:25
  • Re: sub conditionals_true_when (@@), Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 04:44
  • sub conditionals_true_when (@@), Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 04:09
• June 12, 2001
  • Re: Misleading RCS behaviour, Tom Tromey, 22:54
  • SE DESPIDE UN GENIO (GABO), ELKOMPUTO USA CORP., 14:45
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Pavel Roskin, 12:16
  • Re: interpolating automake variables?, Rusty Ballinger, 07:15
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Tim Van Holder, 05:53
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Tim Van Holder, 05:51
  • Re: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is not recognized in automake-1.4-p2, Lars Gullik Bjønnes, 05:36
• June 11, 2001
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Tom Tromey, 23:14
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Guido Draheim, 20:06
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Ralf Corsepius, 18:32
  • Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean, Gary V . Vaughan, 18:10
  • Re: missing does not support configure.ac in CVS or in 1.4-p4, Akim Demaille, 17:44
  • Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean, Akim Demaille, 17:36
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Pavel Roskin, 17:26
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Lars J. Aas, 17:25
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Tim Van Holder, 17:20
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Akim Demaille, 17:09
  • Re: CPP determined incorrectly, Akim Demaille, 17:07
  • Re: Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Tom Tromey, 15:30
  • Re: missing does not support configure.ac in CVS or in 1.4-p4, Gary V . Vaughan, 15:20
  • Canonical way to conditionally add (a large amount of) sources to PROG_SOURCES?, Tim Van Holder, 13:03
  • Re: Misleading RCS behaviour, Paul D. Smith, 01:50
  • missing does not support configure.ac in CVS or in 1.4-p4, Kevin Dalley, 01:22
• June 10, 2001
  • Re: Bug with conditionals. [PATCH], Richard Boulton, 12:10
  • [ANNOUNCE] New stable automake release: automake-1.4-p4, Gary V . Vaughan, 06:53
• June 09, 2001
  • Re: interpolating automake variables?, Alexandre Oliva, 15:29
  • Re: config.sub/config.guess license exception, but not for 'missing', Akim Demaille, 14:14
• June 08, 2001
  • [이벤트] 특별한 혜택!, 이자영, 10:26
  • Re: Fortran 90/95 support (automake), Christian Marquardt, 04:49
• June 07, 2001
  • Re: Fortran 90/95 support (automake), Tom Tromey, 18:41
  • Fortran 90/95 support (automake), marq, 16:41
  • [ANNOUNCE] New stable automake release: automake-1.4-p3, Gary V . Vaughan, 16:34
  • Re: How to tell an extra rule to automake, Tom Tromey, 12:49
  • Re: How to tell an extra rule to automake, Tim Van Holder, 12:48
  • How to tell an extra rule to automake, Stéphane Genaud, 06:20
• June 05, 2001
  • Bug with conditionals. [PATCH], Richard Boulton, 21:33
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Raja R Harinath, 13:10
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 13:07
  • auto generate -DLIBfoo_COMPILATION for libtool libraries, Robert Collins, 12:43
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Tom Tromey, 00:18
• June 04, 2001
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Raja R Harinath, 22:45
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 21:14
  • Re: cygwin libtool breakage, Robert Collins, 21:02
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Tom Tromey, 19:04
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 18:54
  • Re: cygwin libtool breakage, Gary V . Vaughan, 14:55
  • Re: Problem with site.exp in automake-1.4f, Tom Tromey, 11:53
  • ����Ʈ����, ���� ���������� ����..., webmaster, 09:00
  • problems with mdate-sh and version.texi without AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR in 1.4f, Kevin Dalley, 02:11
  • Problem with site.exp in automake-1.4f, Kevin Dalley, 02:04
• June 03, 2001
  • interpolating automake variables?, Rusty Ballinger, 23:19
  • Re: The %.o: %.cc rule, Harlan Stenn, 23:07
  • The %.o: %.cc rule, Clark Rawlins, 22:56
  • Re: [PATCH] fix install on cygwin with shared libraries, Gary V . Vaughan, 05:19
• June 02, 2001
  • [PATCH] fix install on cygwin with shared libraries, Robert Collins, 23:22
• June 01, 2001
  • Re: automake and autoconf, Gary V . Vaughan, 17:14
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Alexandre Oliva, 16:19
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Eric Siegerman, 15:05
  • aclocal: can the "duplicated macro error" be made non-fatal?, Dave Benson, 10:44
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:53
  • Re: AS and ASFLAGS, Richard Boulton, 08:21
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Richard Boulton, 08:13
  • Re: AS and ASFLAGS, Ralf Corsepius, 07:02
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:16
  • Re: Recursive make harmful, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:38

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc