[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More an autopackage
From: |
Michael Sweet |
Subject: |
Re: More an autopackage |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 04:50:46 -0500 |
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> ...
> You normally *have* to package only installed binaries, especially
> with libtool libraries.
Don't get me started about libtool... :)
Actually, now that libtool has pretty much stablized you can just
reference the files under the .libs directory, although I've been
seriously considering adding a check for this in EPM when it sees
an executable (or library) file.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products address@hidden
Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com
- Re: More an autopackage, (continued)
- Re: More an autopackage, Tom Tromey, 2001/01/23
- Re: More an autopackage, Michael Sweet, 2001/01/23
- Re: More an autopackage, David Lee, 2001/01/30
- Re: More an autopackage, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/23
- Re: More an autopackage, Michael Sweet, 2001/01/23
- Re: More an autopackage, Ganesan Rajagopal, 2001/01/23
- Re: More an autopackage,
Michael Sweet <=
- Re: More an autopackage, Harlan Stenn, 2001/01/22
- Re: More an autopackage, Derek R. Price, 2001/01/23
- Re: More an autopackage, Harlan Stenn, 2001/01/23