[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skip_ vs. skip_all_
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: skip_ vs. skip_all_ |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:53:15 +0100 |
On 01/04/2012 07:48 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, I can push it, do you have any issues with the
> below commit message?
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> test defs: skip all tests when the lib requirement isn't fulfilled
>
> * tests/defs (lib): Use skip_all_ instead of skip_, in order to support
> TAP-based test scripts.
>
Sounds good. Thanks!
Stefano