automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] {maint} maintcheck: avoid few spurious failures


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [FYI] {maint} maintcheck: avoid few spurious failures
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:03:36 +0200

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:59:57PM CEST:
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:05:45PM CEST:
> > >  sc_tests_plain_automake:
> > > - @if grep -v '^#' $(srcdir)/tests/*.test | grep -E ':[   
> > > ]*automake([^:]|$$)'; then \
> > > + @if grep -v '^#' $(srcdir)/tests/*.test | grep -E ':[   
> > > ]*automake\>([^:]|$$)'; then \
> > 
> > The RE that was there before was there specifically to emulate the
> > nonportable '\>' construct.  Now, I'm not sure I should fight for using
> > Posix compatible regular expressions in maintainer-check rules (seems I
> > lost that battle earlier already),
> >
> Well, notice that I've just followed the existing practice in using GNU
> grep extensions in the maintcheck rules;

Yes; notice that I had noticed that.

> > but if you require GNU grep, please be consistent and remove the
> > now-unneeded stuff afterwards and the -E.
> >
> OK, I will push the attached patch if that's OK with you.

Ugh; 1/2 seems to be going into the wrong direction of changing test
code to work around suboptimal maintainer checks, so sorry for leading
you on a wrong path there again.  2/2 seems fine, thanks.

> And since I
> was at it, I noticed that the `sc_tests_plain_*' checks were incomplete,
> as they didn't look for autoreconf, autoheader and autom4te too.  What
> fixing this with the second attached patch?

Cheers,
Ralf



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]