Re: New auxiliary archive script

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hallo Ralf,

On 7 Aug 2010, at 13:03, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Darn, we need another name: 'archive' is likely too common when automake
> is going to put all files with that name in the distribution of each
> package using Automake.  No need to send another patch, but any other
> good suggestions that fit in with the existing scripts?
> 
> I don't find arlib so bad, except that it sounds a bit like a library
> rather than a program.
> 
> Suggestions appreciated.

That's no different to the situation with 'compile'.  I think 'archive'
is a perfectly good name as it is.

Cheers,
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan (address@hidden)