[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:37:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:45:47AM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> [...] What I want is just a way to say "dear Automake,
> please ignore this substitution when generating Makefile.ins";
> i.e., I really want to talk to Automake,
OK, you have convinced me.
Though I understand the origin of "_IGNORE", I think we should find
a better name for the "AC_SUBST which doesn't get to Makefile.ins".
What about AM_SUBST_NOMAKE ?
Have a nice day,
Stepan
Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition, Stepan Kasal, 2005/10/18
- Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition, Simon Richter, 2005/10/20
- Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition, Stepan Kasal, 2005/10/19
- Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/10/19
- Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition, Stepan Kasal, 2005/10/19
- multiline substitutions (Was: Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/10/20