[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why not #include "config.h"?
From: |
Steffen Dettmer |
Subject: |
why not #include "config.h"? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:49:58 +0200 |
I hope I don't ask a FAQ. If so, an URL would be appreciated.
I've read here that someone could (should?) write
#include <config.h>
specifying a system header instead of the IMHO correct
#include "config.h"
As far as I know the difference is that in the first version
system directories are searched but user directories in the
second.
Is this a kind of trick for something?
Is is guaranteed that all compilers search the user path after
the system path if the file was not found?
oki,
Steffen
- why not #include "config.h"?,
Steffen Dettmer <=
Re: why not #include "config.h"?, Thomas Dickey, 2009/09/22