[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noooooooooo!
From: |
Bob Rossi |
Subject: |
Re: Noooooooooo! |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:35:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:12:13PM +0000, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >
> > > Josef noted that he did not want this to change. I'm inclined to agree
> > > with him, people who are cross-compiling may not have all of the `tools'
> > > available as triplet-prefixed-name, but are likely to have their PATH
> > > set correctly to point at the cross-tools.
>
> I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the
> first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning.
> But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go.
>
> Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went
> away.
I don't know anything about what you guys are talking about, but, i know
that symlinks don't work well on windows. Do you have a workaround for
msys/windows, or systems that don't handle symlinks well?
Bob Rossi
- Re: Noooooooooo!, (continued)
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Allan Clark, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Autoconf will (not?) detect cross-tools unprefixed (was: Noooooooooo!), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!,
Bob Rossi <=
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02