[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noooooooooo!
From: |
Allan Clark |
Subject: |
Re: Noooooooooo! |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:30:01 -0400 |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 14:22, Bob Friesenhahn
<address@hidden>wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the
>> first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning.
>> But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go.
>>
>> Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went
>> away.
>>
>> I've yet to see a case where fixing this in the way autoconf "wants" is
>> even mildly difficult.
>>
>
> Same here. The course has been set. Let's stick with it.
Not arguing, FWIW, but as a quick check:
Josef, your issue *does* go away if you use symlinks to make your toolchain
match the proper form ?
Going forward to implementation, Josef would make a good quick-check of the
change: that the warning message changes, that he can symlink over and be
functional.
Allan
--
address@hidden "金鱼" http://linkedin.com/in/goldfish
please, no proprietary attachments (http://tinyurl.com/cbgq)
- RE: Noooooooooo!, Duft Markus, 2008/09/01
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Daniel E. Macks, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!,
Allan Clark <=
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Autoconf will (not?) detect cross-tools unprefixed (was: Noooooooooo!), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Rossi, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02