[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS for Fortran array bounds checking.
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS for Fortran array bounds checking. |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:35:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:53:02PM CET:
> On 02/27/2011 09:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > here's a first macro to improve Fortran support in Autoconf.
> > It uses Fortran 90 interface declarations, so a F77 version
> > would have to be different (and I'm not quite sure whether
> > this works as well in Fortran 77). I only have access to a
> > few of the listed compilers, the other flags are taken from
> > manuals only. I gather fixes will come from users over time.
> >
> > OK to push? Eve-Marie, OK to add your name and email to THANKS?
>
> OK from my end, after addressing a nit. In fact, since you are much
> more familiar with Fortran than I am, I'm comfortable with you pushing
> all of your recent Fortran patches if you don't get any better review
> within a few days.
Here we go with an updated patch, which I will push in a minute.
I've addressed your nits, omitted the THANKS update for now (pending
feedback from Eve-Marie), added a few more compilers, and reordered and
reformatted the NEWS entry (in the face of other patches to come).
I also documented the Fortran 90 requirement and the cache variable name
in the manual.
A AC_F77_CHECK_BOUNDS macro would be nice eventually.
Thanks,
Ralf
New macro AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS to enable Fortran array bounds checking.
* lib/autoconf/fortran.m4 (AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS): New macro.
* doc/autoconf.texi (Fortran Compiler): Document it.
* tests/fortran.at (AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS): New test.
* NEWS: Update.
Prompted by report from Eve-Marie Devaliere.
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 3edebd8..0e36b87 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ GNU Autoconf NEWS - User visible changes.
- New macro AC_HEADER_CHECK_STDBOOL.
+- New and updated macros for Fortran support:
+
+ AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS to enable array bounds checking
+
* Noteworthy changes in release 2.68 (2010-09-22) [stable]
Released by Eric Blake, based on git versions 2.67.*.
diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi
index 5fc9ffe..e6ff3ec 100644
--- a/doc/autoconf.texi
+++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
@@ -8248,6 +8248,20 @@ Fortran Compiler
message).
@end defmac
address@hidden AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS (@ovar{action-if-success}, @
+ @dvar{action-if-failure, AC_MSG_FAILURE})
address@hidden
+
+The @code{AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS} macro tries to enable array bounds checking
+in the Fortran compiler. If successful, the @var{action-if-success}
+is called and any needed flags are added to @code{FCFLAGS}. Otherwise,
address@hidden is called, which defaults to failing with an error
+message. The macro currently requires Fortran 90 or a newer dialect.
+
+The result of the macro is cached in the @code{ac_cv_fc_check_bounds}
+variable.
address@hidden defmac
+
@node Go Compiler
@subsection Go Compiler Characteristics
diff --git a/lib/autoconf/fortran.m4 b/lib/autoconf/fortran.m4
index 30544c4..180fc6d 100644
--- a/lib/autoconf/fortran.m4
+++ b/lib/autoconf/fortran.m4
@@ -1367,3 +1367,82 @@ else
fi
AC_LANG_POP([Fortran])dnl
])# AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH
+
+
+# AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS([ACTION-IF-SUCCESS], [ACTION-IF-FAILURE = FAILURE])
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Look for a compiler flag to turn on array bounds checking for the
+# Fortran (FC) compiler, and adds it to FCFLAGS. Call
+# ACTION-IF-SUCCESS (defaults to nothing) if successful (i.e. can
+# compile code using new extension) and ACTION-IF-FAILURE (defaults to
+# failing with an error message) if not. (Defined via DEFUN_ONCE to
+# prevent flag from being added to FCFLAGS multiple times.)
+#
+# The known flags are:
+# -fcheck=all, -fbounds-check: gfortran
+# -fbounds-check: g77, g95
+# -CB, -check bounds: Intel compiler (icc, ecc, ifort)
+# -C: Sun/Oracle compiler (f95)
+# -C, -qcheck: IBM compiler (xlf)
+# -Mbounds: Portland Group compiler
+# -C ,-Mbounds: Cray
+# -C, -check_bounds: SGI compiler
+# -check_bounds, +check=all: HP Fortran
+# -C, -Rb -Rc: Absoft (-Rb: array boundaries, -Rc: array conformance)
+# --chk e,s -chk (e,s): Lahey
+# -C -C=all: NAGWare
+# -C, -ffortran-bounds-check: PathScale pathf90
+# -C: f2c
+# -BOunds: Open Watcom
+AC_DEFUN_ONCE([AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS],
+[AC_LANG_PUSH([Fortran])dnl
+AC_CACHE_CHECK([for Fortran flag to enable array-bounds checking],
+ [ac_cv_fc_check_bounds],
+[ac_cv_fc_check_bounds=unknown
+ac_fc_check_bounds_FCFLAGS_save=$FCFLAGS
+for ac_flag in -fcheck=bounds -fbounds-check -check_bounds -Mbounds -qcheck \
+ '-check bounds' +check=all --check '-Rb -Rc' -CB -C=all -C \
+ -ffortran-bounds-check "--chk e,s" "-chk e -chk s" -bounds
+do
+ FCFLAGS="$ac_fc_check_bounds_FCFLAGS_save $ac_flag"
+ # We should be able to link a correct program.
+ AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([], [])],
+ [AC_LINK_IFELSE([[
+ subroutine sub(a)
+ integer a(:)
+ a(8) = 0
+ end subroutine
+
+ program main
+ integer a(1:7)
+ interface
+ subroutine sub(a)
+ integer a(:)
+ end subroutine
+ end interface
+
+ call sub(a)
+ end program]],
+ [# If we can run the program, require failure at run time.
+ # In cross-compiling mode, we rely on the compiler not accepting
+ # unknown options.
+ AS_IF([test "$cross_compiling" = yes],
+ [ac_cv_fc_check_bounds=$ac_flag; break],
+ [AS_IF([_AC_DO_TOKENS(./conftest$ac_exeext)],
+ [],
+ [ac_cv_fc_check_bounds=$ac_flag; break])])])])
+done
+rm -f conftest$ac_exeext conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+FCFLAGS=$ac_fc_check_bounds_FCFLAGS_save
+])
+if test "x$ac_cv_fc_check_bounds" = xunknown; then
+ m4_default([$2],
+ [AC_MSG_ERROR([no Fortran flag for bounds checking found], 77)])
+else
+ if test "x$ac_cv_fc_check_bounds" != xnone; then
+ FCFLAGS="$FCFLAGS $ac_cv_fc_check_bounds"
+ fi
+ $1
+fi
+AC_LANG_POP([Fortran])dnl
+])# AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS
diff --git a/tests/fortran.at b/tests/fortran.at
index 87403a7..4986ee4 100644
--- a/tests/fortran.at
+++ b/tests/fortran.at
@@ -932,3 +932,62 @@ EOF
done
AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+## ------------------- ##
+## AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS. ##
+## ------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS])
+
+AT_DATA([Makefile.in],
address@hidden@: address@hidden@
+ @FC@ @FCFLAGS@ -o $@ address@hidden@ @LIBS@
+
+.SUFFIXES: .f address@hidden@
address@hidden@:
+ @FC@ @FCFLAGS@ -c @FCFLAGS_f@ $<
+
+clean:
+ rm -f address@hidden@ address@hidden@
+]])
+
+cat >configure.ac <<EOF
+AC_INIT
+AC_PROG_FC
+AC_FC_SRCEXT([f])
+AC_FC_CHECK_BOUNDS
+AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
+AC_OUTPUT
+EOF
+
+AT_DATA([prog.f],
+[[
+ subroutine copy(a,b,n)
+ integer a(:), b(:), n, i
+ do i = 1, n
+ a(i) = b(i)
+ end do
+ end subroutine
+
+ program main
+ integer, parameter :: n = 20
+ integer a(1:n), b(1:n-1), i
+ interface
+ subroutine copy(a,b,n)
+ integer a(:), b(:), i
+ end subroutine
+ end interface
+
+ call copy(a,b,n)
+ end program
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK_AUTOCONF
+AT_CHECK_CONFIGURE
+: "${MAKE=make}"
+AT_CHECK([$MAKE], [], [ignore], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([./prog || exit 1], [1], [ignore], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([$MAKE clean], [], [ignore], [ignore])
+
+AT_CLEANUP