[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:31:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:05:21PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> My own software does not currently depend on limits.h but tests I did
> separately on many types of systems (including several 12 year old ones)
> with a program which specifically exercises limits.h (including 'char')
> did not encounter any problems.
thank you for your information. On that ground, I have prepared the
following patch. Ok to commit?
Have a nice day,
Stepan
0001-Make-AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED-obsolete.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/24
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/25
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/25
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Andreas Schwab, 2008/06/25
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/26
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/26
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/26
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 2008/06/28
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/26
- Re: Why AC_C_CHAR_UNSIGNED?, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/26