[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fix AT_SETUP's sh-escaping
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: fix AT_SETUP's sh-escaping |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 21:46:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* Joel E. Denny wrote on Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:44:52PM CET:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > everywhere is a complete waste. IMHO we should document that
> > backslashes in AT_SETUP's argument are dangerous (who would need that
> > anyway?),
>
> I have a test suite for regular expression handling. I find that
> embedding the regular expressions (with many special characters like
> backslash) in the titles is helpful.
Hmm. Well, I can try and see how far I can get; we can still decide
then. In any case the testsuite wasn't exposing some of the potential
pitfall cases.
Meanwhile, I'd be interested in hearing whether using shell functions
for a compact/efficient fix would be suitable (a func_echo comes to
mind), or an approach in the manner of how Libtool sets/uses $echo/$ECHO
which in the worst case of running '$0 --fallback-echo' is _very_ _very_
expensive.
Cheers,
Ralf