[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:55:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:32:40PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> So it seems to me that `$egrep -f' has a good chance of success, as
> it seems to work on all systems I looked at.
settled; thank you for helping with the decision.
> > ad 2) I think the most convenient way would be to use a shell function.
>
> Well, if you go just for -f, there is no need for a function, no?
Yes; function would help us to switch between -f and the current solution,
if it were necessary.
Have a nice day,
Stepan
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/01
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/02
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/02
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/02
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/04
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/04
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/04
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/04
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/06
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/06
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/09
- Re: generated tests/*.at in cvs?, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/04