[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fix building autoconf.1
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: Fix building autoconf.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:25:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:27:37PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> bit easier to follow, from the point of view of the person running
> 'make'.
I understand your point.
> The idea is to use '@' to compute the command to be run, but
> avoid '@' when actually running the command.
Wouldn't it be enough to echo the command before executing it?
When I look at Makefile.in, I see that Automake uses the technique on
several places. And, yes, it means the command is duplicated, but I
think that after all it's less fragille that your clever rule set.
And even if it isn't perfect, it can be a good compromise between comfort
of the user running `make' and the one reading Makefile.am.
Can I commit this patch?
Stepan
ac_man_makefile2.patch
Description: Text document