[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:10:25 -0800 (PST) |
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:50:00 +0000
> From: Oliver Kiddle <address@hidden>
>
> How can I compare DBL_MAX and LDBL_MAX at compile-time?
int a[LDBL_MAX <= DBL_MAX ? -1 : 1];
> To catch float.h being missing, can I just #include it and rely on the
> failure of the C compiler to force a negative result to the test?
Yes.
- AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/07
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 2001/11/07
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/09
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/15
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 2001/11/15
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/16
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/16
- FYI: AC_LONG_DOUBLE patch for IRIX 5.3, and for GCC 2.95.2, Paul Eggert, 2001/11/16