[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3 |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:09:11 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Oliver Kiddle <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:03:23 +0000
But isn't this the correct answer on Irix? long double is supported
and is equivalent to 'double'. The C standard allows 'long double'
to be equivalent to 'double'.
The compiler warnings are admittedly annoying, but you can ignore them.
> - exit (sizeof (long double) < sizeof (double));
> + exit (sizeof (long double) <= sizeof (double));
This patch isn't correct, as the two sizes can be equal on conforming
implementations.
- AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/07
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/09
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/15
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Paul Eggert, 2001/11/15
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/16
- Re: AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE is wrong on IRIX 5.3, Oliver Kiddle, 2001/11/16
- FYI: AC_LONG_DOUBLE patch for IRIX 5.3, and for GCC 2.95.2, Paul Eggert, 2001/11/16