Re: Possible patch for autoconf?

autoconf-patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible patch for autoconf?

From:	Akim Demaille
Subject:	Re: Possible patch for autoconf?
Date:	11 May 2001 17:40:56 +0200
User-agent:	Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)

> Well, this code is too complex.  We struggle too much with it, let's
> rewrite it completely.  What do you people think about this?

I'm applying it.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Possible patch for autoconf?, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/03
- Re: Possible patch for autoconf?, Daniel Carroll, 2001/05/03
  - Re: Possible patch for autoconf?, Daniel Carroll, 2001/05/07
    - FYI: Testing AC_PROG_CPP via CC (Was: Possible patch for autoconf?), Akim Demaille, 2001/05/10
    - Re: FYI: Testing AC_PROG_CPP via CC (Was: Possible patch for autoconf?), Ralf Corsepius, 2001/05/11
    - Re: FYI: Testing AC_PROG_CPP via CC (Was: Possible patch for autoconf?), Akim Demaille, 2001/05/11
  - Re: Possible patch for autoconf?, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/10
    - Re: Possible patch for autoconf?, Akim Demaille <=

Prev by Date: Re: FYI: Testing AC_PROG_CPP via CC (Was: Possible patch for autoconf?)
Next by Date: Re: FYI: Testing AC_PROG_CPP via CC (Was: Possible patch for autoconf?)
Previous by thread: Re: Possible patch for autoconf?
Next by thread: AM_PROG_LEX vs AC_DECL_YYTEXT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread