[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:30:10 -0400 (EDT) |
Hello, Akim!
> but then it only means we have to set ac_exeext before running
> AC_LINK_IFELSE, right? I have to read what Morten wrote again, I
> forgot :)
Ok, you patch does what I meant.
> How about this patch first? Pavel, if you OK it and I don't appear to
> apply it (I'm going to leave soon), could you apply it? Thanks!
Europe is going below horizon :-)
Ok, I'll apply it unless the testuite fails (I don't mean those 4 tests
that fail already).
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/10
- [PATCH] A better _AC_EXEEXT, Take II, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/12
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/12
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/10/11
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/11
RE: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/10/12
RE: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/10/12