[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT
|
From: |
Morten Eriksen |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT |
|
Date: |
11 Oct 2000 17:22:13 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.3 |
* Akim
| I agree there are *two* issues. One is that there is a AC_REQUIRE
| circular dependency because AC_EXEXT uses AC_LINK_IFELSE, the other
| is that both AC_LINK_IFELSE and AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_link) are
| inappropriate here.
Aha. How about the attached patch, then?
Regards,
Morten
exeext3.diff
Description: Text document
- [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/10
- [PATCH] A better _AC_EXEEXT, Take II, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT,
Morten Eriksen <=
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/12
- Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/12
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/10/11
Re: [PATCH] A better (?) _AC_EXEEXT, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/11