[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedur
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2005 14:00:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-05-24) writes:
>
>> By the way: does anyone object if I replace the initial #!/bin/sh
>> line in install-sh and mkinstalldirs with just : ? The scripts get
>> called from the Makefile (which requires a Bourne shell) anyway,
>> and there is so much that can go wrong with #!/bin/sh... Like
>> there being no executable /bin/sh, or there being no executable
>> /bin/sh^M, or a number of different things.
>
> Have we had problems with this?
I suspect that the failures to execute mkinstalldirs on MacOSX might
be related to that.
> I briefly followed the discussion about line endings emacs-devel and
> must say that I find it ridiculous that line endings can be replaced
> during a CVS checkout.
text is text, binary is binary.
> I mean, that's a problem of the CVS client, right?
More like a problem with DOS in general.
Well, in this case it turns out to be a problem with Perl. The
documentation I have been finding on the web suggests that it converts
non-binary opened files into \n when reading and writing.
The bug reports don't suggest that. If we get the Perl script to
output consistent results regardless of the input, I think we ought to
be able to get away without warning about any end-of-line conversion
problems. I don't think we have any binary files in our distribution
at the moment (the icon image files are all text).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- [AUCTeX-devel] Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, Evil Boris, 2005/05/23
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, David Kastrup, 2005/05/23
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, Evil Boris, 2005/05/23
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, David Kastrup, 2005/05/24
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/24
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, David Kastrup, 2005/05/24
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/24
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/24
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, David Kastrup, 2005/05/24
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, Evil Boris, 2005/05/24
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Two odd features with "new" installation procedure, David Kastrup, 2005/05/25