Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: Where do I get pthread.h?

[gz8cx4]

Regarding a reply to my message:

On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:04:30PM +0100, david.koch@libertysurf.fr wrote:
> Indeed, I'd say focus on more up to date and elaborate programming languages.
> C, while nice as a "portable assembler" is still full of quirks and tricks.
> Which show how unstable and unprofessional it is 50 years after its creation.
> Many "extensions" and as you state, "unfortunately" packaged by many vendors.

Let us make some observations.

1. This is a list dedicated to a C compiler. Insulting the language of our
interest, with the knowledge of our (mostly quite well informed) choices,
is not a friendly behavior.

2. Historical packaging practices and their unfortunate pedagogical
consequences are not a property of the language. I am quoted in a very
misleading way.

3. What does it actually mean, an "unprofessional" programming language?
Whose professionalism is meant? An insult against its users? Something else?

An incoherent inflammatory message indicates ... trolling.

Not worth to react to.

Regards,
/tccm