Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?

[Daniel Roesler]

You're right. I was mis-reading the colors. Doh!

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Andrew Gallagher <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 01/09/15 16:46, Daniel Roesler wrote:
>> An interesting issue: pgp.mit.edu (probably the most well known
>> keyserver) only peers with one other domain in the pool
>> (keys.riverwillow.net.au), and that peer doesn't peer with anyone else
>> in the pool. All their peers appear to be out of the pool.
>
> Your graph says pgp.mit.edu has nine pool peers, as does Kristian's
> status page...
>
> https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/pgp.mit.edu
>
> And keys.riverwillow.net.au has four pool peers including MIT...
>
> https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keys.riverwillow.net.au
>
> A
>