sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?


From: Kristian Fiskerstrand
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:24:00 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/01/2015 04:19 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> Has anyone performed a survey of sks servers to see how well 
> connected we are? How fragile is the network under failure 
> conditions? Do we rely too much on a small number of links?
> 

If you have a good eye-sight (or a zoom button), you see one such
graphical display e.g. on [0] that is generated
based on .dot files I produce out of the network mesh recorded.

Although I look at them manually from time to time, no proper
statistical analysis or review has been performed on this information.

References:
[0] https://sks-keyservers.net/files/2014-09_NUUG.pdf

- -- 
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- ----------------------------
Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
- ----------------------------
"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but
what they conceal is vital."
(Aaron Levenstein)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5bT9AAoJECULev7WN52FMxsIALvhYfMmUbYNoxrHi9NF3/M8
I/Zd9HWQkQSVIy8f8FRgiQnAfoSpYhnH7WYPGIBwlezCzQqQu7g/priEMhtAR7gA
5+RHG+PybgsWXCokWzlo1/mxo7a1ePpGB30CVT697qQBVe8PRF1BQJsD9pgjOmul
p9ZrNxnC3W4nI5RsXvhJDPFVgMWPCdBGliaaNZZ6JDlPlf67eDWRmL1FwKGSeG8D
TZKagoq4VutJiq0SbOro09Rtt+cZBcYy4tXCpz+IE3ntkhhtejM9aVhb03KLUu5g
ptcP2p9kN5ZSRHyHp0/xPmHAUTxkyZSiilgc17BKBiqVijZ8RQq73CL45n67F3U=
=to5m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]