[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Invalid Signature
From: |
John Clizbe |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Invalid Signature |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:19:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.20pre) Gecko/20110606 Mnenhy/0.8.4 SeaMonkey/2.0.15pre |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 5:48 PM, Timothy Holtzen wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestions. Assuming signing worked on this
>> message, turning on PGP/MIME seems to have resolved the issue.
>
> Looks good. As a word of warning, though, PGP/MIME is known to *not*
> work with older versions of Mailman. Older versions of Mailman will
> break PGP/MIME signatures.
And LookOut for certain MUAs from a rather LARGE software house that do not
parse PGP/MIME at all
- --
John P. Clizbe Inet:John ( a ) Enigmail DAWT net
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:address@hidden
Raise your hand if you know someone who is alive only because you
did not want to spend time in jail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12-svn5502-2010-12-23 (Windows XP)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Comment: Be part of the £33 ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption.
Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=
=k8z7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----