qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] pvrdma: release ring object in case of an e


From: Yuval Shaia
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] pvrdma: release ring object in case of an error
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:08:04 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:09:19PM +0530, P J P wrote:
> +-- On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, P J P wrote --+
> | | Also, can you rebase this patch on top of the patchset i posted last week:
> | | https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10705439/
> | 
> | Okay, I'll send revised patch set. Thanks so much for the prompt review.
> 
> I tried to git apply above patch-set over v3.1.0-rc2, v3.1.0-rc0, v3.0.0. But 
> it does not seem to apply cleanly.
> 
> ===
> $ git branch rdma v3.1.0-rc0

Can you try master?
I just did a rebase on top of master and had no conflicts.

> $ git checkout rdma 
> Switched to branch 'rdma'
> $ git apply --check /tmp/add-support-for-RDMA-MAD.patch
> error: patch failed: Makefile.objs:1
> error: Makefile.objs: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c:224
> error: hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c: patch does not apply
> ===
> 
> I skipped one of the makefile.objs/.json patch, applied others and then 
> hand-fixed one of the patch pvrdma_cmd.c.
> 
> After that when I try to build QEMU, it fails with
> 
> ===
>  $ ./configure --prefix=/tmp/ --enable-debug
>       --target-list='x86_64-softmmu x86_64-linux-user'
>       --enable-rdma --with-sdlabi=2.0
>  $ make
> ../qemu/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c:1132:5: error: implicit declaration of 
> function 
> ‘qapi_event_send_rdma_gid_status_changed’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]  
> qapi_event_send_rdma_gid_status_changed(ifname, true,
> ...
> ../qemu/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c:22:10: fatal error: qapi/qapi-events-rdma.h: 
> No 
> such file or directory
>  #include "qapi/qapi-events-rdma.h"
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> ===
> 
> Not sure if other patches are required. Any idea?
> 
> Thank you.
> --
> Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
> 47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]