qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG]Unassigned mem write during pci device hot-plug


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG]Unassigned mem write during pci device hot-plug
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:14:10 -0500

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 03:12:53AM +0000, xuyandong wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:58:59AM +0000, xuyandong wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In our test, we configured VM with several pci-bridges and a
> > > virtio-net nic been attached with bus 4,
> > >
> > > After VM is startup, We ping this nic from host to judge if it is
> > > working normally. Then, we hot add pci devices to this VM with bus 0.
> > >
> > > We  found the virtio-net NIC in bus 4 is not working (can not connect)
> > > occasionally, as it kick virtio backend failure with error below:
> > >
> > >     Unassigned mem write 00000000fc803004 = 0x1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > memory-region: pci_bridge_pci
> > >
> > >   0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, RW): pci_bridge_pci
> > >
> > >     00000000fc800000-00000000fc803fff (prio 1, RW): virtio-pci
> > >
> > >       00000000fc800000-00000000fc800fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > virtio-pci-common
> > >
> > >       00000000fc801000-00000000fc801fff (prio 0, RW): virtio-pci-isr
> > >
> > >       00000000fc802000-00000000fc802fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > virtio-pci-device
> > >
> > >       00000000fc803000-00000000fc803fff (prio 0, RW):
> > > virtio-pci-notify  <- io mem unassigned
> > >
> > >       …
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We caught an exceptional address changing while this problem happened,
> > > show as
> > > follow:
> > >
> > > Before pci_bridge_update_mappings:
> > >
> > >       00000000fc000000-00000000fc1fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fc000000-00000000fc1fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fc200000-00000000fc3fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fc200000-00000000fc3fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fc400000-00000000fc5fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fc400000-00000000fc5fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fc600000-00000000fc7fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fc600000-00000000fc7fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fc800000-00000000fc9fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fc800000-00000000fc9fffff
> > > <- correct Adress Spce
> > >
> > >       00000000fca00000-00000000fcbfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fca00000-00000000fcbfffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fcc00000-00000000fcdfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fcc00000-00000000fcdfffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fce00000-00000000fcffffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fce00000-00000000fcffffff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After pci_bridge_update_mappings:
> > >
> > >       00000000fda00000-00000000fdbfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fda00000-00000000fdbfffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fdc00000-00000000fddfffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fdc00000-00000000fddfffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fde00000-00000000fdffffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fde00000-00000000fdffffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fe000000-00000000fe1fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe000000-00000000fe1fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fe200000-00000000fe3fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe200000-00000000fe3fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fe400000-00000000fe5fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe400000-00000000fe5fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fe600000-00000000fe7fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe600000-00000000fe7fffff
> > >
> > >       00000000fe800000-00000000fe9fffff (prio 1, RW): alias
> > > pci_bridge_mem @pci_bridge_pci 00000000fe800000-00000000fe9fffff
> > >
> > >       fffffffffc800000-fffffffffc800000 (prio 1, RW): alias 
> > > pci_bridge_pref_mem
> > > @pci_bridge_pci fffffffffc800000-fffffffffc800000   <- Exceptional Adress
> > Space
> > 
> > This one is empty though right?
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > We have figured out why this address becomes this value,  according to
> > > pci spec,  pci driver can get BAR address size by writing 0xffffffff
> > > to
> > >
> > > the pci register firstly, and then read back the value from this register.
> > 
> > 
> > OK however as you show below the BAR being sized is the BAR if a bridge. Are
> > you then adding a bridge device by hotplug?
> 
> No, I just simply hot plugged a VFIO device to Bus 0, another interesting 
> phenomenon is
> If I hot plug the device to other bus, this doesn't happened.
>  
> > 
> > 
> > > We didn't handle this value  specially while process pci write in
> > > qemu, the function call stack is:
> > >
> > > Pci_bridge_dev_write_config
> > >
> > > -> pci_bridge_write_config
> > >
> > > -> pci_default_write_config (we update the config[address] value here
> > > -> to
> > > fffffffffc800000, which should be 0xfc800000 )
> > >
> > > -> pci_bridge_update_mappings
> > >
> > >                 ->pci_bridge_region_del(br, br->windows);
> > >
> > > -> pci_bridge_region_init
> > >
> > >                                                                 ->
> > > pci_bridge_init_alias (here pci_bridge_get_base, we use the wrong
> > > value
> > > fffffffffc800000)
> > >
> > >                                                 ->
> > > memory_region_transaction_commit
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So, as we can see, we use the wrong base address in qemu to update the
> > > memory regions, though, we update the base address to
> > >
> > > The correct value after pci driver in VM write the original value
> > > back, the virtio NIC in bus 4 may still sends net packets concurrently
> > > with
> > >
> > > The wrong memory region address.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We have tried to skip the memory region update action in qemu while
> > > detect pci write with 0xffffffff value, and it does work, but
> > >
> > > This seems to be not gently.
> > 
> > For sure. But I'm still puzzled as to why does Linux try to size the BAR of 
> > the
> > bridge while a device behind it is used.
> > 
> > Can you pls post your QEMU command line?
> 
> My QEMU command line:
> /root/xyd/qemu-system-x86_64 -name guest=Linux,debug-threads=on -S -object 
> secret,id=masterKey0,format=raw,file=/var/run/libvirt/qemu/domain-194-Linux/master-key.aes
>  -machine pc-i440fx-2.8,accel=kvm,usb=off,dump-guest-core=off -cpu 
> host,+kvm_pv_eoi -bios /usr/share/OVMF/OVMF.fd -m 
> size=4194304k,slots=256,maxmem=33554432k -realtime mlock=off -smp 
> 20,sockets=20,cores=1,threads=1 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-4,mem=1024 -numa 
> node,nodeid=1,cpus=5-9,mem=1024 -numa node,nodeid=2,cpus=10-14,mem=1024 -numa 
> node,nodeid=3,cpus=15-19,mem=1024 -uuid 34a588c7-b0f2-4952-b39c-47fae3411439 
> -no-user-config -nodefaults -chardev 
> socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/run/libvirt/qemu/domain-194-Linux/monitor.sock,server,nowait
>  -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -no-hpet 
> -global kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=delay -no-shutdown -boot strict=on -device 
> pci-bridge,chassis_nr=1,id=pci.1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x8 -device 
> pci-bridge,chassis_nr=2,id=pci.2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x9 -device 
> pci-bridge,chassis_nr=3,id=pci.3,bus=pci.0,addr=0xa -device 
> pci-bridge,chassis_nr=4,id=pci.4,bus=pci.0,addr=0xb -device 
> pci-bridge,chassis_nr=5,id=pci.5,bus=pci.0,addr=0xc -device 
> piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2 -device 
> usb-ehci,id=usb1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x10 -device 
> nec-usb-xhci,id=usb2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x11 -device 
> virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3 -device 
> virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -device 
> virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 -device 
> virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi3,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6 -device 
> virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x7 -drive 
> file=/mnt/sdb/xml/centos_74_x64_uefi.raw,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,cache=none
>  -device 
> virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x2,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=1
>  -drive if=none,id=drive-ide0-1-1,readonly=on,cache=none -device 
> ide-cd,bus=ide.1,unit=1,drive=drive-ide0-1-1,id=ide0-1-1 -netdev 
> tap,fd=35,id=hostnet0 -device 
> virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:89:5d:8b,bus=pci.4,addr=0x1
>  -chardev pty,id=charserial0 -device 
> isa-serial,chardev=charserial0,id=serial0 -device 
> usb-tablet,id=input0,bus=usb.0,port=1 -vnc 0.0.0.0:0 -device 
> cirrus-vga,id=video0,vgamem_mb=8,bus=pci.0,addr=0x12 -device 
> virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0xd -msg timestamp=on
> 
> I am also very curious about this issue, in the linux kernel code, maybe 
> double check in function pci_bridge_check_ranges triggered this problem.

If you can get the stacktrace in Linux when it tries to write this
fffff value, that would be quite helpful.


> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> > >
> > > index b2e50c3..84b405d 100644
> > >
> > > --- a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> > >
> > > +++ b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> > >
> > > @@ -256,7 +256,8 @@ void pci_bridge_write_config(PCIDevice *d,
> > >
> > >      pci_default_write_config(d, address, val, len);
> > >
> > > -    if (ranges_overlap(address, len, PCI_COMMAND, 2) ||
> > >
> > > +    if ( (val != 0xffffffff) &&
> > >
> > > +        (ranges_overlap(address, len, PCI_COMMAND, 2) ||
> > >
> > >          /* io base/limit */
> > >
> > >          ranges_overlap(address, len, PCI_IO_BASE, 2) ||
> > >
> > > @@ -266,7 +267,7 @@ void pci_bridge_write_config(PCIDevice *d,
> > >
> > >          ranges_overlap(address, len, PCI_MEMORY_BASE, 20) ||
> > >
> > >          /* vga enable */
> > >
> > > -        ranges_overlap(address, len, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2)) {
> > >
> > > +        ranges_overlap(address, len, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, 2))) {
> > >
> > >          pci_bridge_update_mappings(s);
> > >
> > >      }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thinks,
> > >
> > > Xu
> > >



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]